BioNMR
NMR aggregator & online community since 2003
BioNMR    
Learn or help to learn NMR - get free NMR books!
 

Go Back   BioNMR > NMR community > News from NMR blogs
Advanced Search
Home Forums Wiki NMR feeds Downloads Register Today's Posts



Jobs Groups Conferences Literature Pulse sequences Software forums Programs Sample preps Web resources BioNMR issues


Webservers
NMR processing:
MDD
NMR assignment:
Backbone:
Autoassign
MARS
UNIO Match
PINE
Side-chains:
UNIO ATNOS-Ascan
NOEs:
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
ASDP
Structure from NMR restraints:
Ab initio:
GeNMR
Cyana
XPLOR-NIH
ASDP
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
Fragment-based:
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Rosetta-NMR (Robetta)
Template-based:
GeNMR
I-TASSER
Refinement:
Amber
Structure from chemical shifts:
Fragment-based:
WeNMR CS-Rosetta
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Homology-based:
CS23D
Simshift
Torsion angles from chemical shifts:
Preditor
TALOS
Promega- Proline
Secondary structure from chemical shifts:
CSI (via RCI server)
TALOS
MICS caps, β-turns
d2D
PECAN
Flexibility from chemical shifts:
RCI
Interactions from chemical shifts:
HADDOCK
Chemical shifts re-referencing:
Shiftcor
UNIO Shiftinspector
LACS
CheckShift
RefDB
NMR model quality:
NOEs, other restraints:
PROSESS
PSVS
RPF scores
iCing
Chemical shifts:
PROSESS
CheShift2
Vasco
iCing
RDCs:
DC
Anisofit
Pseudocontact shifts:
Anisofit
Protein geomtery:
Resolution-by-Proxy
PROSESS
What-If
iCing
PSVS
MolProbity
SAVES2 or SAVES4
Vadar
Prosa
ProQ
MetaMQAPII
PSQS
Eval123D
STAN
Ramachandran Plot
Rampage
ERRAT
Verify_3D
Harmony
Quality Control Check
NMR spectrum prediction:
FANDAS
MestReS
V-NMR
Flexibility from structure:
Backbone S2
Methyl S2
B-factor
Molecular dynamics:
Gromacs
Amber
Antechamber
Chemical shifts prediction:
From structure:
Shiftx2
Sparta+
Camshift
CH3shift- Methyl
ArShift- Aromatic
ShiftS
Proshift
PPM
CheShift-2- Cα
From sequence:
Shifty
Camcoil
Poulsen_rc_CS
Disordered proteins:
MAXOCC
Format conversion & validation:
CCPN
From NMR-STAR 3.1
Validate NMR-STAR 3.1
NMR sample preparation:
Protein disorder:
DisMeta
Protein solubility:
camLILA
ccSOL
Camfold
camGroEL
Zyggregator
Isotope labeling:
UPLABEL
Solid-state NMR:
sedNMR


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2018, 10:11 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,777
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 193,617
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Field Dependence of a Simple Spin System

Field Dependence of a Simple Spin System

With the recent re-emergence of low-field NMR spectrometers at proton frequencies of 40, 60, 80 and 100 MHz, many younger NMR users (who have grown up with high-field spectrometers) are encountering more and more second-order spectra. These spectra are observed when the frequency difference between signals is comparable to the coupling between them. On a 600 MHz spectrometer, 1 ppm in a 1H spectrum = 600 Hz while on a 60 MHz spectrometer, 1 ppm in a 1H spectrum is only 60 Hz. Unlike frequency differences between signals (in Hz) which depend on the field strength, the coupling between signals (in Hz) is field invariant. Easily interpreted first-order spectra on high-field instruments can be information rich but much more complicated second-order spectra on low-field instruments. The figure below shows simulated 1H NMR spectra of a fictitious isolated ethyl group as a function of field strength. The difference in chemical shift between the -CH3 and -CH2- signals is 0.5 ppm and the 3JH-H coupling constant is 10 Hz. The spectra are plotted on a ppm scale on the left and on a Hz scale on the right. At higher fields, one immediately recognizes the familiar triplet and quartet. At lower fields, the spectra are much more complicated. The signals are closer to one another (in Hz) and therefore have more second-order character as the frequency difference between signals becomes comparable to the coupling between them.



Source: University of Ottawa NMR Facility Blog
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Stan NMR blog] Fitting of spin system parameters to NMR spectra, revisited
Fitting of spin system parameters to NMR spectra, revisited Proposal of a new fast algorithm to simulate spin systems spectra. Source: Stan blog library
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 03-19-2017 07:03 AM
Perspective: revisiting the field dependence of TROSY sensitivity
Perspective: revisiting the field dependence of TROSY sensitivity Abstract The discovery of the TROSY effect (Pervushin et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12366ā??12371, 1997) for reducing transverse relaxation and line sharpening through selecting pathways in which dipoleā??dipole and CSA Hamiltonians partially cancel each other had a tremendous impact on solution NMR studies of macromolecules. Together with the methyl TROSY (Tugarinov and Kay in J Biomol NMR 28:165ā??172, 2004) it enabled structural and functional studies of significantly larger...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 11-20-2016 08:57 AM
Singlet lifetime measurements in an all-proton chemically equivalent spin system by hyperpolarization and weak spin lock transfers
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Singlet lifetime measurements in an all-proton chemically equivalent spin system by hyperpolarization and weak spin lock transfers Zhang, Y., et al., Singlet lifetime measurements in an all-proton chemically equivalent spin system by hyperpolarization and weak spin lock transfers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015. 17(37): p. 24370-24375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP03716F
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 02-16-2016 12:40 AM
The magnetic field dependence of cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarization under magic angle spinning
From The DNP-NMR Blog: The magnetic field dependence of cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarization under magic angle spinning Mance, D., et al., The magnetic field dependence of cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarization under magic angle spinning. J. Chem. Phys., 2015. 142(23): p. 234201. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4922219
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 07-06-2015 04:35 PM
Temperature dependence of high field 13C dynamic nuclear polarization processes with trityl radicals below 35 Kelvin
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Temperature dependence of high field 13C dynamic nuclear polarization processes with trityl radicals below 35 Kelvin Walker, S.A., et al., Temperature dependence of high field 13C dynamic nuclear polarization processes with trityl radicals below 35 Kelvin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51628H
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 09-06-2013 06:52 PM
Temperature Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl in Polystyrene
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Temperature Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl in Polystyrene Meyer, V., S. Eaton, and G. Eaton, Temperature Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl in Polystyrene. Appl. Magn. Reson., 2013. 44(4): p. 509-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00723-012-0417-7
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 04-15-2013 10:32 PM
Computational Study andMolecular Orbital Analysisof NMR Shielding, Spin–Spin Coupling, and Electric Field Gradientsof Azido Platinum Complexes
Computational Study andMolecular Orbital Analysisof NMR Shielding, Spin–Spin Coupling, and Electric Field Gradientsof Azido Platinum Complexes Kiplangat Sutter and Jochen Autschbach http://pubs.acs.org/appl/literatum/publisher/achs/journals/content/jacsat/0/jacsat.ahead-of-print/ja3040762/aop/images/medium/ja-2012-040762_0008.gif Journal of the American Chemical Society DOI: 10.1021/ja3040762 http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/acs/jacsat?d=yIl2AUoC8zA http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/acs/jacsat/~4/XTeiJ4ddvO4
nmrlearner Journal club 0 08-04-2012 05:22 AM
Simple tests for the validation of multiple field spin relaxation data
Simple tests for the validation of multiple field spin relaxation data Abstract 15N spin relaxation data is widely used to extract detailed dynamic information regarding bond vectors such as the amide Nā??H bond of the protein backbone. Analysis is typically carried using the Lipariā??Szabo model-free approach. Even though the original model-free equation can be determined from single field R 1, R 2 and NOE, over-determination of more complex motional models is dependent on the recording of multiple field datasets. This is especially important for the characterization of conformational...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 01-09-2011 12:46 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



BioNMR advertisements to pay for website hosting and domain registration. Nobody does it for us.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright, BioNMR.com, 2003-2013
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Map