BioNMR
NMR aggregator & online community since 2003
BioNMR    
Learn or help to learn NMR - get free NMR books!
 

Go Back   BioNMR > NMR community > News from NMR blogs
Advanced Search
Home Forums Wiki NMR feeds Downloads Register Today's Posts



Jobs Groups Conferences Literature Pulse sequences Software forums Programs Sample preps Web resources BioNMR issues


Webservers
NMR processing:
MDD
NMR assignment:
Backbone:
Autoassign
MARS
UNIO Match
PINE
Side-chains:
UNIO ATNOS-Ascan
NOEs:
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
ASDP
Structure from NMR restraints:
Ab initio:
GeNMR
Cyana
XPLOR-NIH
ASDP
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
Fragment-based:
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Rosetta-NMR (Robetta)
Template-based:
GeNMR
I-TASSER
Refinement:
Amber
Structure from chemical shifts:
Fragment-based:
WeNMR CS-Rosetta
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Homology-based:
CS23D
Simshift
Torsion angles from chemical shifts:
Preditor
TALOS
Promega- Proline
Secondary structure from chemical shifts:
CSI (via RCI server)
TALOS
MICS caps, β-turns
d2D
PECAN
Flexibility from chemical shifts:
RCI
Interactions from chemical shifts:
HADDOCK
Chemical shifts re-referencing:
Shiftcor
UNIO Shiftinspector
LACS
CheckShift
RefDB
NMR model quality:
NOEs, other restraints:
PROSESS
PSVS
RPF scores
iCing
Chemical shifts:
PROSESS
CheShift2
Vasco
iCing
RDCs:
DC
Anisofit
Pseudocontact shifts:
Anisofit
Protein geomtery:
Resolution-by-Proxy
PROSESS
What-If
iCing
PSVS
MolProbity
SAVES2 or SAVES4
Vadar
Prosa
ProQ
MetaMQAPII
PSQS
Eval123D
STAN
Ramachandran Plot
Rampage
ERRAT
Verify_3D
Harmony
Quality Control Check
NMR spectrum prediction:
FANDAS
MestReS
V-NMR
Flexibility from structure:
Backbone S2
Methyl S2
B-factor
Molecular dynamics:
Gromacs
Amber
Antechamber
Chemical shifts prediction:
From structure:
Shiftx2
Sparta+
Camshift
CH3shift- Methyl
ArShift- Aromatic
ShiftS
Proshift
PPM
CheShift-2- Cα
From sequence:
Shifty
Camcoil
Poulsen_rc_CS
Disordered proteins:
MAXOCC
Format conversion & validation:
CCPN
From NMR-STAR 3.1
Validate NMR-STAR 3.1
NMR sample preparation:
Protein disorder:
DisMeta
Protein solubility:
camLILA
ccSOL
Camfold
camGroEL
Zyggregator
Isotope labeling:
UPLABEL
Solid-state NMR:
sedNMR


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2014, 08:50 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,777
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 193,617
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Dynamic nuclear polarization using frequency modulation at 3.34T

From The DNP-NMR Blog:

Dynamic nuclear polarization using frequency modulation at 3.34T


Hovav, Y., et al., Dynamic nuclear polarization using frequency modulation at 3.34T. J Magn Reson, 2013. 238C(0): p. 94-105.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24333831


During dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiments polarization is transferred from unpaired electrons to their neighboring nuclear spins, resulting in dramatic enhancement of the NMR signals. While in most cases this is achieved by continuous wave (cw) irradiation applied to samples in fixed external magnetic fields, here we show that DNP enhancement of static samples can improve by modulating the microwave (MW) frequency at a constant field of 3.34T. The efficiency of triangular shaped modulation is explored by monitoring the 1H signal enhancement in frozen solutions containing different TEMPOL radical concentrations at different temperatures. The optimal modulation parameters are examined experimentally and under the most favorable conditions a threefold enhancement is obtained with respect to constant frequency DNP in samples with low radical concentrations. The results are interpreted using numerical simulations on small spin systems. In particular, it is shown experimentally and explained theoretically that: (i) The optimal modulation frequency is higher than the electron spin-lattice relaxation rate. (ii) The optimal modulation amplitude must be smaller than the nuclear Larmor frequency and the EPR line-width, as expected. (iii) The MW frequencies corresponding to the enhancement maxima and minima are shifted away from one another when using frequency modulation, relative to the constant frequency experiments.


Go to The DNP-NMR Blog for more info.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solid-phase polarization matrixes for dynamic nuclear polarization from homogeneously distributed radicals in mesostructured hybrid silica materials
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Solid-phase polarization matrixes for dynamic nuclear polarization from homogeneously distributed radicals in mesostructured hybrid silica materials Gajan, D., et al., Solid-phase polarization matrixes for dynamic nuclear polarization from homogeneously distributed radicals in mesostructured hybrid silica materials. J Am Chem Soc, 2013. 135(41): p. 15459-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23978152
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 01-04-2014 01:39 AM
Solid-Phase Polarization Matrixes for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization from Homogeneously Distributed Radicals in Mesostructured Hybrid Silica Materials
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Solid-Phase Polarization Matrixes for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization from Homogeneously Distributed Radicals in Mesostructured Hybrid Silica Materials Gajan, D., et al., Solid-Phase Polarization Matrixes for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization from Homogeneously Distributed Radicals in Mesostructured Hybrid Silica Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013. 135(41): p. 15459-15466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja405822h
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 12-30-2013 03:15 PM
Dynamic nuclear polarization of (17)o: direct polarization
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Dynamic nuclear polarization of (17)o: direct polarization Michaelis, V.K., et al., Dynamic nuclear polarization of (17)o: direct polarization. J Phys Chem B, 2013. 117(48): p. 14894-906. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24195759
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 12-20-2013 08:40 PM
Over 35% liquid-state (13)C polarization obtained via dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization at 7 T and 1 K using ubiquitous nitroxyl radicals
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Over 35% liquid-state (13)C polarization obtained via dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization at 7 T and 1 K using ubiquitous nitroxyl radicals Cheng, T., et al., Over 35% liquid-state (13)C polarization obtained via dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization at 7 T and 1 K using ubiquitous nitroxyl radicals. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013. 15(48): p. 20819-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24217111
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 11-29-2013 09:58 PM
Highly Efficient, Water-Soluble Polarizing Agents for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Frequency
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Highly Efficient, Water-Soluble Polarizing Agents for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Frequency Sauvee, C., et al., Highly Efficient, Water-Soluble Polarizing Agents for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Frequency. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2013. 52(41): p. 10858-10861. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956072
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 11-22-2013 03:09 PM
Cross Polarization for Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Experiments at Readily Accessible Temperatures 1.2*
From The DNP-NMR Blog: Cross Polarization for Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Experiments at Readily Accessible Temperatures 1.2*
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 11-21-2013 01:14 AM
High Frequency Dynamic Nuclear Polarization
From The DNP-NMR Blog: High Frequency Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Ni, Q.Z., et al., High Frequency Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Acc Chem Res, 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23597038
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 06-07-2013 10:42 PM
Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization below 25 K
Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization below 25 K Publication year: 2012 Source:Journal of Magnetic Resonance</br> Kent R. Thurber, Alexey Potapov, Wai-Ming Yau, Robert Tycko</br> We describe an apparatus for solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) with dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and magic-angle spinning (MAS) at 20-25 K and 9.4 Tesla. The MAS NMR probe uses helium to cool the sample space and nitrogen gas for MAS drive and bearings, as described earlier (Thurber et al., J. Magn. Reson. 2008) ,...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 11-21-2012 04:33 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



BioNMR advertisements to pay for website hosting and domain registration. Nobody does it for us.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright, BioNMR.com, 2003-2013
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Map