BioNMR
NMR aggregator & online community since 2003
BioNMR    
Learn or help to learn NMR - get free NMR books!
 

Go Back   BioNMR > NMR community > News from NMR blogs
Advanced Search
Home Forums Wiki NMR feeds Downloads Register Today's Posts



Jobs Groups Conferences Literature Pulse sequences Software forums Programs Sample preps Web resources BioNMR issues


Webservers
NMR processing:
MDD
NMR assignment:
Backbone:
Autoassign
MARS
UNIO Match
PINE
Side-chains:
UNIO ATNOS-Ascan
NOEs:
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
ASDP
Structure from NMR restraints:
Ab initio:
GeNMR
Cyana
XPLOR-NIH
ASDP
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
Fragment-based:
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Rosetta-NMR (Robetta)
Template-based:
GeNMR
I-TASSER
Refinement:
Amber
Structure from chemical shifts:
Fragment-based:
WeNMR CS-Rosetta
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Homology-based:
CS23D
Simshift
Torsion angles from chemical shifts:
Preditor
TALOS
Promega- Proline
Secondary structure from chemical shifts:
CSI (via RCI server)
TALOS
MICS caps, β-turns
d2D
PECAN
Flexibility from chemical shifts:
RCI
Interactions from chemical shifts:
HADDOCK
Chemical shifts re-referencing:
Shiftcor
UNIO Shiftinspector
LACS
CheckShift
RefDB
NMR model quality:
NOEs, other restraints:
PROSESS
PSVS
RPF scores
iCing
Chemical shifts:
PROSESS
CheShift2
Vasco
iCing
RDCs:
DC
Anisofit
Pseudocontact shifts:
Anisofit
Protein geomtery:
Resolution-by-Proxy
PROSESS
What-If
iCing
PSVS
MolProbity
SAVES2 or SAVES4
Vadar
Prosa
ProQ
MetaMQAPII
PSQS
Eval123D
STAN
Ramachandran Plot
Rampage
ERRAT
Verify_3D
Harmony
Quality Control Check
NMR spectrum prediction:
FANDAS
MestReS
V-NMR
Flexibility from structure:
Backbone S2
Methyl S2
B-factor
Molecular dynamics:
Gromacs
Amber
Antechamber
Chemical shifts prediction:
From structure:
Shiftx2
Sparta+
Camshift
CH3shift- Methyl
ArShift- Aromatic
ShiftS
Proshift
PPM
CheShift-2- Cα
From sequence:
Shifty
Camcoil
Poulsen_rc_CS
Disordered proteins:
MAXOCC
Format conversion & validation:
CCPN
From NMR-STAR 3.1
Validate NMR-STAR 3.1
NMR sample preparation:
Protein disorder:
DisMeta
Protein solubility:
camLILA
ccSOL
Camfold
camGroEL
Zyggregator
Isotope labeling:
UPLABEL
Solid-state NMR:
sedNMR


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2018, 06:45 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,777
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 193,617
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Decoupling Bandwidth and Distorted Line Shapes

Decoupling Bandwidth and Distorted Line Shapes

Broadband X nucleus decoupling (X = 13C, 15N, 31P, 11B, 19F etc.....) is frequently used in 1H detected 2D HSQC/HMQC data collection or in standard 1D 1H spectra to aid in structure assignment. When broadband decoupling schemes are used, one must keep in mind that they are not infinitely broadbanded. They have finite bandwidths over which they are effective thus limiting the chemical shift range for the decoupled nuclide. The effective bandwidth depends on the particular decoupling scheme and the decoupling power used. If multiple peaks are to be decoupled, one must insure that all peaks are within the decoupler bandwidth. One can determine experimentally the effective decoupling bandwidth by running a series of 1H spectra varying the decoupler offset frequency. Such a measurement is shown in the figure below for the P-CH3 methyl resonance of dimethyl methylphosphonate. 300 MHz 1H [31P] NMR spectra were collected in a pseudo-2D fashion, incrementing the decoupler offset frequency from 200 ppm to -200 ppm from the 31P resonance frequency in 1 ppm steps. Broadband GARP decoupling was employed with a power of 3125 Hz (80 µsec 90° pulses). The pseudo-2D contour plot is shown in the left-hand panel and a stacked plot is shown in the right-hand panel.
One can see that the effective decoupling bandwidth is 15.56 kHz or 128 ppm on a 300 MHz instrument. When the decoupler offset exceeds ±64 ppm from the 31P resonance frequency, one obtains distorted line shapes. Representative distorted line shapes are shown in the figure below. The bottom spectrum was collected with no 31P decoupling. The top, fully decoupled spectrum was collected with on-resonance 31P GARP decoupling. The middle spectra, highlighted in pink, are representative distorted spectra outside of the effective decoupling bandwidth.
If one is not aware of the decoupling offset and available bandwidth, one may obtain misleading line shapes subject to misinterpretation.


Source: University of Ottawa NMR Facility Blog
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] Distorted/antiphase signals when doing Dosy
Distorted/antiphase signals when doing Dosy Hello, I am running Dosy experiment using ledbpgp2s sequence. I am getting sort of signal distortions. I tried the solutions you have mentioned in your discussions. I couldn't execute the loopadj as it always says lock gain is too high. I try to change the lock gain manually but still it couldn't keep that value. Finally, i performed Dosy with out lock on. I did lock off,locnuc off and l12 = 0 and run the experiment again but the problem still persists. I tried with other wide bore spectrometer and I don't get the distortion. The problem...
nmrlearner News from other NMR forums 0 03-31-2015 06:18 AM
[NMR images] Peak shapes in NMR Spectroscopy
http://img.docstoccdn.com/thumb/orig/88324422.png 2/06/2014 8:50:00 AM GMT Peak shapes in NMR Spectroscopy More...
nmrlearner NMR pictures 0 06-02-2014 08:49 AM
[NMR paper] Refocused continuous-wave decoupling: a new approach to heteronuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state NMR spectroscopy.
Refocused continuous-wave decoupling: a new approach to heteronuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state NMR spectroscopy. http://www.bionmr.com//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:--link.aip.org-jhtml-linkto.gif Related Articles Refocused continuous-wave decoupling: a new approach to heteronuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Chem Phys. 2012 Dec 7;137(21):214202 Authors: Vinther JM, Nielsen AB, Bjerring M, van Eck ER, Kentgens AP, Khaneja N, Nielsen NC Abstract A novel strategy for heteronuclear dipolar...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 06-01-2013 02:03 PM
NMR line shapes and multi-state binding equilibria
NMR line shapes and multi-state binding equilibria Abstract Biological function of proteins relies on conformational transitions and binding of specific ligands. Proteinā??ligand interactions are thermodynamically and kinetically coupled to conformational changes in protein structures as conceptualized by the models of pre-existing equilibria and induced fit. NMR spectroscopy is particularly sensitive to complex ligand-binding modesā??NMR line-shape analysis can provide for thermodynamic and kinetic constants of ligand-binding equilibria with the site-specific resolution. However,...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 05-24-2012 05:54 AM
[U. of Ottawa NMR Facility Blog] Weak Lock Signals and Distorted NMR Spectra
Weak Lock Signals and Distorted NMR Spectra A good 2H lock signal with a high signal-to-noise ratio is a real advantage for maintaining a stable magnetic field for long data acquisitions and also for shimming the magnet using the lock signal. Sometimes, however it is desirable to run NMR spectra for samples with only a only a very small quantity of deuterated solvent and therefore a very weak lock signal. Such may be the case when one is monitoring a chemical reaction by removing aliquots and adding a drop or two of a deuterated solvent to help with magnet shimming using the 2H lock...
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 04-20-2012 09:33 PM
[NMRwiki tweet] nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/
nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/ nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/ Source: NMRWiki tweets
nmrlearner Twitter NMR 0 02-08-2011 08:02 AM
[NMRwiki tweet] nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/
nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/ nmrwiki: Are acquisition bandwidth and receiver bandwidth the same thing? #nmrhttp://qa.nmrwiki.org/question/226/ Source: NMRWiki tweets
nmrlearner Twitter NMR 0 02-08-2011 07:54 AM
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] distorted DOSY ID
distorted DOSY ID Why are some Dosy spectra 1d so distorted?. How can this be overcome? Check if somebody has answered this question on NMRWiki QA forum
nmrlearner News from other NMR forums 0 01-07-2011 12:10 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



BioNMR advertisements to pay for website hosting and domain registration. Nobody does it for us.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright, BioNMR.com, 2003-2013
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Map