BioNMR
NMR aggregator & online community since 2003
BioNMR    
Learn or help to learn NMR - get free NMR books!
 

Go Back   BioNMR > NMR community > News from NMR blogs
Advanced Search
Home Forums Wiki NMR feeds Downloads Register Today's Posts



Jobs Groups Conferences Literature Pulse sequences Software forums Programs Sample preps Web resources BioNMR issues


Webservers
NMR processing:
MDD
NMR assignment:
Backbone:
Autoassign
MARS
UNIO Match
PINE
Side-chains:
UNIO ATNOS-Ascan
NOEs:
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
ASDP
Structure from NMR restraints:
Ab initio:
GeNMR
Cyana
XPLOR-NIH
ASDP
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
Fragment-based:
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Rosetta-NMR (Robetta)
Template-based:
GeNMR
I-TASSER
Refinement:
Amber
Structure from chemical shifts:
Fragment-based:
WeNMR CS-Rosetta
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Homology-based:
CS23D
Simshift
Torsion angles from chemical shifts:
Preditor
TALOS
Promega- Proline
Secondary structure from chemical shifts:
CSI (via RCI server)
TALOS
MICS caps, β-turns
d2D
PECAN
Flexibility from chemical shifts:
RCI
Interactions from chemical shifts:
HADDOCK
Chemical shifts re-referencing:
Shiftcor
UNIO Shiftinspector
LACS
CheckShift
RefDB
NMR model quality:
NOEs, other restraints:
PROSESS
PSVS
RPF scores
iCing
Chemical shifts:
PROSESS
CheShift2
Vasco
iCing
RDCs:
DC
Anisofit
Pseudocontact shifts:
Anisofit
Protein geomtery:
Resolution-by-Proxy
PROSESS
What-If
iCing
PSVS
MolProbity
SAVES2 or SAVES4
Vadar
Prosa
ProQ
MetaMQAPII
PSQS
Eval123D
STAN
Ramachandran Plot
Rampage
ERRAT
Verify_3D
Harmony
Quality Control Check
NMR spectrum prediction:
FANDAS
MestReS
V-NMR
Flexibility from structure:
Backbone S2
Methyl S2
B-factor
Molecular dynamics:
Gromacs
Amber
Antechamber
Chemical shifts prediction:
From structure:
Shiftx2
Sparta+
Camshift
CH3shift- Methyl
ArShift- Aromatic
ShiftS
Proshift
PPM
CheShift-2- Cα
From sequence:
Shifty
Camcoil
Poulsen_rc_CS
Disordered proteins:
MAXOCC
Format conversion & validation:
CCPN
From NMR-STAR 3.1
Validate NMR-STAR 3.1
NMR sample preparation:
Protein disorder:
DisMeta
Protein solubility:
camLILA
ccSOL
Camfold
camGroEL
Zyggregator
Isotope labeling:
UPLABEL
Solid-state NMR:
sedNMR


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2017, 07:43 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,777
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 193,617
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Correcting NMR Spectra for Poor Shimming - Reference Deconvolution

Correcting NMR Spectra for Poor Shimming - Reference Deconvolution

The pleasingly symmetric and narrow Lorentzian resonances in a high resolution NMR spectrum are truly things of stunning beauty, appreciated by all NMR spectroscopists. Their majesty depends on the homogeneity of the NMR magnet around the sample. Inhomogeneous fields yield low resolution NMR spectra with broad asymmetric peaks pleasing no one. These repugnant, distasteful spectra are often obtained when automatic shimming routines are used on under-filled samples, samples with solids present (precipitates, floaters of suspended solids), samples with thermal gradients, poorly mixed samples etc…. Have you ever looked at such a spectrum and longed to recover the hidden beauty, resolution and information you know is present in the depths of its repulsive form? In many such cases reference deconvolution is a processing technique able to help. The distortions in a spectrum from an inhomogeneous magnetic field affect all peaks in the spectrum in the same way. The imperfect FID giving rise to the offensive spectrum, FIDexp(t), is essentially a perfect FID, FID(t) multiplied by an error function, E(t), resulting from the inhomogeneous field.

FIDexp(t) = FID(t) * E(t)

If we could find the error function and divide the experimental FID, by it, we could produce a perfect (or at least improved) FID, the Fourier transform of which would be a spectrum corrected from the effects of field inhomogeneity. In the reference deconvolution technique, one selects a high signal-to-noise ratio singlet peak as a reference in the experimental spectrum and sets all other points in the spectrum to zero. This spectrum is inverse Fourier transformed to produce an FID of the distorted singlet, FIDrexp(t). A synthetic FID, FIDrsyn(t) is constructed for what one would expect the time domain signal to be for a perfect reference peak (e.g. a sharp Lorentzian). The error function for the reference peak Er(t) is then determined by:

Er(t) = FIDrexp(t) / FIDrsyn(t)

Since all peaks in the experimental spectrum are affected equally by the inhomogeneity, E(t) = Er(t) and we can compute a corrected FID for the entire spectrum,

FID(t) = FIDexp(t) / Er(t)

The corrected FID is Fourier transformed yielding a much improved spectrum. This technique is available in newer NMR software processing packages and is particularly easy to implement in the MestReNova software package available to NMR users at the University of Ottawa. An example is shown in the figure below for a 300 MHz 1H NMR spectrum of a mixture of compounds.
The top two traces show portions of the spectrum obtained in a carefully shimmed magnet. The middle traces show the same portions of the spectrum obtained in a poorly shimmed magnet. The bottom traces were obtained by applying reference deconvolution to the spectrum obtained in the poorly shimmed magnet. Clearly, there is much improvement in the reference deconvoluted spectrum, allowing one to obtain much more information and recover some of the lost beauty. In fact, the corrected spectrum is very similar to the one obtained in the homogeneous field of a carefully shimmed magnet. The penalty paid is a lower signal-to-noise ratio, as the noise from the experimental reference signal is convolved into the error function which in turn gets convolved into the corrected spectrum. The loss in signal-to-noise ratio can be minimized by choosing a reference signal with a higher signal-to-noise ratio.


Source: University of Ottawa NMR Facility Blog
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[NMR paper] Deconvolution of Complex 1D NMR Spectra Using Objective Model Selection.
Deconvolution of Complex 1D NMR Spectra Using Objective Model Selection. Deconvolution of Complex 1D NMR Spectra Using Objective Model Selection. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134474 Authors: Hughes TS, Wilson HD, de Vera IM, Kojetin DJ Abstract Fluorine (19F) NMR has emerged as a useful tool for characterization of slow dynamics in 19F-labeled proteins. One-dimensional (1D) 19F NMR spectra of proteins can be broad, irregular and complex, due to exchange of probe nuclei between distinct electrostatic environments; and therefore cannot...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 08-05-2015 08:21 PM
[NMR analysis blog] Reference Deconvolution
Reference Deconvolution Introduction In an idealized situation, according to quantum mechanics theory, NMR transitions in liquid state and excluding dynamic effects such as chemical exchange are of Lorentzian shape . In practice NMR lineshapes are never pure Lorentzians due to a number of reasons , ranging from magnetic field inhomogeneity and magnetic field noise to sample temperature gradients, sample spinning or FID weighting, to cite a few. Another important property that might affect significantly the final observed lineshape is the following: Even in molecules of modest size...
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 01-05-2014 04:14 PM
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] poor signal to noise on 1H-15N heteronculear NOE
poor signal to noise on 1H-15N heteronculear NOE I have recently attempted to run a 1H-15N heteronuclear NOE experiment in vnmrj (700 rt probe) using the standard sequence that comes with biopack, the signal to nose im getting compared to my standard HSQC is significantly reduced, is this normal? I do not recall this being the case when I ran this previously on a bruker 600 with RT probe? is this normal or does this suggest something is miss set? Also in the no NOE experiment I get very broad noise in the centre of my spectrum/water line. regards Tom
nmrlearner News from other NMR forums 0 11-01-2011 01:52 AM
[NMR paper] Elimination of 13Calpha splitting in protein NMR spectra by deconvolution with maximu
Elimination of 13Calpha splitting in protein NMR spectra by deconvolution with maximum entropy reconstruction. Related Articles Elimination of 13Calpha splitting in protein NMR spectra by deconvolution with maximum entropy reconstruction. J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Mar 5;125(9):2382-3 Authors: Shimba N, Stern AS, Craik CS, Hoch JC, Dötsch V Homonuclear 13C-13C couplings can significantly reduce the sensitivity and resolution of multidimensional NMR experiments. The most important of these couplings is the 13Calpha-13Cbeta coupling, and several...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 11-24-2010 09:01 PM
Conformations of stevastelin C3 analogs: computational deconvolution of NMR data reve
Conformations of stevastelin C3 analogs: computational deconvolution of NMR data reveals conformational heterogeneity and novel motifs. Related Articles Conformations of stevastelin C3 analogs: computational deconvolution of NMR data reveals conformational heterogeneity and novel motifs. Biopolymers. 2010 Nov;93(11):968-76 Authors: Jogalekar AS The stevastelins are depsipeptide natural products that show valuable immunomodulatory and phosphatase inhibitory activity. A previous report described the synthesis, conformational analysis, and biological...
nmrlearner Journal club 0 11-06-2010 11:02 AM
[Stan NMR blog] Reference Convolution of Low Resolution FIDs in the Presence of Poor Magnetic Field H
Reference Convolution of Low Resolution FIDs in the Presence of Poor Magnetic Field Homogeneity POSTER: A simple approach to meaningful analysis of distorted NMR FIDs. More...
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 08-21-2010 06:14 PM
[Stan NMR blog] NMR tubes, or how to get poor very fast
NMR tubes, or how to get poor very fast Comments about storing, cleaning and sealing of NMR spectroscopy sample tubes More...
nmrlearner News from NMR blogs 0 08-21-2010 05:42 PM
shimming
Hello Dose any one can estimate how are the results of shimming depend on the spectral character of the shim standard ? (for any NMR system) For example using single peak vs 2 peak material such as water or xylene Thanks
oferv NMR Questions and Answers 0 02-22-2007 12:06 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



BioNMR advertisements to pay for website hosting and domain registration. Nobody does it for us.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright, BioNMR.com, 2003-2013
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Map