BioNMR
NMR aggregator & online community since 2003
BioNMR    
Learn or help to learn NMR - get free NMR books!
 

Go Back   BioNMR > NMR community > News from NMR blogs
Advanced Search
Home Forums Wiki NMR feeds Downloads Register Today's Posts



Jobs Groups Conferences Literature Pulse sequences Software forums Programs Sample preps Web resources BioNMR issues


Webservers
NMR processing:
MDD
NMR assignment:
Backbone:
Autoassign
MARS
UNIO Match
PINE
Side-chains:
UNIO ATNOS-Ascan
NOEs:
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
ASDP
Structure from NMR restraints:
Ab initio:
GeNMR
Cyana
XPLOR-NIH
ASDP
UNIO ATNOS-Candid
UNIO Candid
Fragment-based:
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Rosetta-NMR (Robetta)
Template-based:
GeNMR
I-TASSER
Refinement:
Amber
Structure from chemical shifts:
Fragment-based:
WeNMR CS-Rosetta
BMRB CS-Rosetta
Homology-based:
CS23D
Simshift
Torsion angles from chemical shifts:
Preditor
TALOS
Promega- Proline
Secondary structure from chemical shifts:
CSI (via RCI server)
TALOS
MICS caps, β-turns
d2D
PECAN
Flexibility from chemical shifts:
RCI
Interactions from chemical shifts:
HADDOCK
Chemical shifts re-referencing:
Shiftcor
UNIO Shiftinspector
LACS
CheckShift
RefDB
NMR model quality:
NOEs, other restraints:
PROSESS
PSVS
RPF scores
iCing
Chemical shifts:
PROSESS
CheShift2
Vasco
iCing
RDCs:
DC
Anisofit
Pseudocontact shifts:
Anisofit
Protein geomtery:
Resolution-by-Proxy
PROSESS
What-If
iCing
PSVS
MolProbity
SAVES2 or SAVES4
Vadar
Prosa
ProQ
MetaMQAPII
PSQS
Eval123D
STAN
Ramachandran Plot
Rampage
ERRAT
Verify_3D
Harmony
Quality Control Check
NMR spectrum prediction:
FANDAS
MestReS
V-NMR
Flexibility from structure:
Backbone S2
Methyl S2
B-factor
Molecular dynamics:
Gromacs
Amber
Antechamber
Chemical shifts prediction:
From structure:
Shiftx2
Sparta+
Camshift
CH3shift- Methyl
ArShift- Aromatic
ShiftS
Proshift
PPM
CheShift-2- Cα
From sequence:
Shifty
Camcoil
Poulsen_rc_CS
Disordered proteins:
MAXOCC
Format conversion & validation:
CCPN
From NMR-STAR 3.1
Validate NMR-STAR 3.1
NMR sample preparation:
Protein disorder:
DisMeta
Protein solubility:
camLILA
ccSOL
Camfold
camGroEL
Zyggregator
Isotope labeling:
UPLABEL
Solid-state NMR:
sedNMR


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-29-2020, 09:52 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,732
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 193,617
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default 13C-13C Connectivity via 1H-13C 1,1-ADEQUATE

13C-13C Connectivity via 1H-13C 1,1-ADEQUATE

One of the most valuable pieces of information one could obtain in elucidating the structure of a small organic molecule is carbon-carbon connectivity information. This information can sometimes be indirectly deduced from HMBC and/or H2BC data with reasonable sensitivity. The same information can be determined directly, albeit with dramatically less sensitivity, using the 13C INADEQUATE technique. Another option for obtaining carbon-carbon connectivity information is the 1,1-ADEQUATE technique (Adequate sensitivity DoublE QUAnTum spEctroscopy). This method is proton detected and relies on a 1-bond INEPT transfer between 1H and 13C. One-bond 13C-13C double quantum coherence between the carbon bound to the proton used for the initial INEPT transfer and adjacent carbons is allowed to evolve in much the same way as in the INADEQUATE technique. Magnetization is transferred back to single quantum coherence for proton detection. The 2D NMR data show correlations between the proton resonances and the double quantum frequencies between the carbon attached to the proton and those carbons bound to that carbon. The carbon-carbon connectivity information is provided in the double quantum carbon frequencies. One drawback to the 1,1-ADEQUATE technique is that connectivity cannot be established between two quaternary carbon atoms not attached to protonated carbons. Connectivity information between a quaternary carbon bound to a protonated carbon can however be established. The sensitivity advantage of the 1,1-ADEQUATE technique compared to the 13C INADEQUATE technique arises from 1H rather than 13C detection and that the recycle delay depends on the proton T1's rather than the 13C T1's. Here is an example of how one could use the 1,1-ADEQUATE technique with other methods to unambiguously assign the structure of a small organic molecule. The edited HSQC spectrum of the unknown molecule with separately acquired 1H and 13C NMR spectra as projections is shown in the figure below.
The 13C spectrum provides all of the 13C frequencies, while the edited HSQC signals provide the 1H-13C one-bond connectivity and multiplicities for each protonated carbon. Note that the carbon frequencies could also be determined from a high resolution HMBC spectrum if insufficient material is available for a direct 13C measurement. From the carbon frequencies, one can determine all of the double quantum frequencies as shown in the table below, taking into account the 13C offset frequency expressed in ppm, 'o1p'.
Those highlighted in pink are those that are present in the 1,1-ADEQUATE spectrum which is shown below.
The spectrum was acquired on a concentrated sample at 600 MHz with a cryoprobe using the standard 'adeq11etgpsp' Bruker pulse program . The total data collection time was less than 1 hour. The carbon-carbon connectivity is labelled on the spectrum based on the double quantum frequencies using the numbering scheme from the 13C spectrum presented as the projection on the edited HSQC spectrum above. From these connectivities, the structure of the compound can unambiguously be assigned to limonene.



Source: University of Ottawa NMR Facility Blog
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] adequate NMR
adequate NMR Hi, I am really confused about reading the adequate 1J(CC) results, Can anyone help me with that?What is the difference between the blue and the red dots?Excuse me , but i am just starting with NMR Check if somebody has answered this question on NMRWiki QA forum
nmrlearner News from other NMR forums 0 01-30-2015 12:15 PM
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] 1,n-ADEQUATE setup
1,n-ADEQUATE setup I need to measure the 4-bond coupling into a group of unassigned quaternary carbons.I would like to use the 1,n-ADEQUATE but it is commonly displayed as a DQ format which is not comparable to the standard 2D axis. I read about a refocused version of the 1,1-ADEQUATE. This refocusing makes it possible to directly compare the spectra of traditional non-DQ formats so I was wondering if the same refocusing period could be used in the 1,n experiment? If not, how do you optimize the indirect DQ formated axis (in Bruker SW and O2P) of the 1,n-ADEQUATE experiment if you...
nmrlearner News from other NMR forums 0 07-29-2011 11:48 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



BioNMR advertisements to pay for website hosting and domain registration. Nobody does it for us.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright, BioNMR.com, 2003-2013
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Map