Multidimensional solid-state NMR spectra of oriented membrane proteins can be used to infer the backbone torsion angles and hence the overall protein fold by measuring dipolar couplings and chemical shift anisotropies, which depend on the orientation of each peptide plane with respect to the external magnetic field. However, multiple peptide plane orientations can be consistent with a given set of angular restraints. This ambiguity is further exacerbated by experimental uncertainty in obtaining and interpretingÂ*such restraints. The previously developed algorithms for structure calculations using angular restraints typically involve a sequential walkthrough along the backbone to find the torsion angles between the consecutive peptide plane orientations that are consistent with the experimental data. This method is sensitive to experimental uncertainty in interpreting the peak positions of as low asâ??±â??10Â*Hz, often yielding high structural RMSDs for the calculated structures. Here we present a significantly improved version of the algorithm which includes the fitting of several peptide planes at once in order to prevent propagation of error along the backbone. In addition, a protocol has been devised for filtering the structural solutions using Rosetta scoring functions in order to find the structures that both fit the spectrum and satisfy bioinformatics restraints. The robustness of the new algorithm has been tested using synthetic angular restraints generated from the known structures for two proteins: a soluble protein 2gb1 (56 residues), chosen for its diverse secondary structure elements, i.e. an alpha-helix and two beta-sheets, and a membrane protein 4a2n, from which the first two transmembrane helices (having a total of 64 residues) have been used. Extensive simulations have been performed by varying the number of fitted planes, experimental error, and the number of NMR dimensions. It has been found that simultaneously fitting two peptide planes always shifted the distribution of the calculated structures toward lower structural RMSD values as compared to fitting a single torsion-angle pair. For each protein, irrespective of the simulation parameters, Rosetta was able to distinguish the most plausible structures, often having structural RMSDs lower than 2Â*Ã? with respect to the original structure. This study establishes a framework for de-novo protein structure prediction using a combination of solid-state NMR angular restraints and bioinformatics.
ProteinNMR Structures Refined with Rosetta Have HigherAccuracy Relative to Corresponding X-ray Crystal Structures
ProteinNMR Structures Refined with Rosetta Have HigherAccuracy Relative to Corresponding X-ray Crystal Structures
Binchen Mao, Roberto Tejero, David Baker and Gaetano T. Montelione
http://pubs.acs.org/appl/literatum/publisher/achs/journals/content/jacsat/0/jacsat.ahead-of-print/ja409845w/aop/images/medium/ja-2013-09845w_0009.gif
Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI: 10.1021/ja409845w
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/acs/jacsat?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/acs/jacsat/~4/7Lshnyi2_Vs
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
01-24-2014 10:47 AM
[NMR paper] Protein NMR Structures Refined with Rosetta Have Higher Accuracy Relative to Corresponding X-ray Crystal Structures.
Protein NMR Structures Refined with Rosetta Have Higher Accuracy Relative to Corresponding X-ray Crystal Structures.
Protein NMR Structures Refined with Rosetta Have Higher Accuracy Relative to Corresponding X-ray Crystal Structures.
J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Jan 6;
Authors: Mao B, Tejero R, Baker D, Montelione GT
Abstract
We have found that refinement of protein NMR structures using Rosetta with experimental NMR restraints yields more accurate protein NMR structures than those that have been deposited in the PDB using standard refinement...
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
01-08-2014 11:23 AM
[NMR paper] An overview of tools for the validation of protein NMR structures.
An overview of tools for the validation of protein NMR structures.
An overview of tools for the validation of protein NMR structures.
J Biomol NMR. 2013 Jul 23;
Authors: Vuister GW, Fogh RH, Hendrickx PM, Doreleijers JF, Gutmanas A
Abstract
Biomolecular structures at atomic resolution present a valuable resource for the understanding of biology. NMR spectroscopy accounts for 11*% of all structures in the PDB repository. In response to serious problems with the accuracy of some of the NMR-derived structures and in order to facilitate...
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
07-24-2013 04:52 PM
Local protein backbone folds determined by calculated NMR chemical shifts.
Local protein backbone folds determined by calculated NMR chemical shifts.
Local protein backbone folds determined by calculated NMR chemical shifts.
J Comput Chem. 2011 Sep 9;
Authors: Czajlik A, Hudáky I, Perczel A
Abstract
NMR chemical shifts (CSs: ?N(NH) , ?C(?) , ?C(?) , ?C', ?H(NH) , and ?H(?) ) were computed for the amino acid backbone conformers (?(L) , ?(L) , ?(L) , ?(L) , ?(L) , ?(D) , ?(D) , ?(D) , and ?(D) ) modeled by oligoalanine structures. Topological differences of the extended fold were investigated on single ?-strands,...
[NMR paper] Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA
Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long-time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water.
Related Articles Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long-time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water.
Proteins. 1996 Mar;24(3):304-13
Authors: Berndt KD, Güntert P, Wüthrich K
The NMR solution structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) obtained by distance geometry...
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
08-22-2010 02:27 PM
Validation of NMR-derived protein structures, Chris Spronk
Here's a good PowerPoint presentation by Chris Spronk (University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands) on the subject of validating NMR protein structure results (adapted by Jurgen F. Doreleijers - University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA)
http://tang.bmrb.wisc.edu/~jurgen/presents/Madison/Biochem%20801/NMR_validation_biochem801_2005.ppt
The presentation is very well-annotated, so be sure to adjust your view in PowerPoint so that you can see the notes.