Related ArticlesNMR difference spectroscopy with a dual saddle-coil difference probe.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004 Mar;378(6):1520-7
Authors: Macnaughtan MA, Smith AP, Goldsbrough PB, Santini RE, Raftery D
A new difference probe for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is presented. The difference probe uses two saddle-shaped coils to excite and detect two samples simultaneously. The samples are held in a specially modified 3-mm NMR tube with an Ultem plastic disk to separate the samples. The probe's resonant circuit contains two crossed diodes that passively switch the relative phase of each coil during the NMR experiment. The result is a difference spectrum from the two samples. The degree of cancellation of common signals was determined to be approximately 90%, and the application of the probe to relaxation-edited difference spectroscopy for identifying protein-ligand interactions was demonstrated using glutathione and glutathione S-transferase binding protein.
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] Tuning probe failed after a dual probe was replaced with a BBI probe
Tuning probe failed after a dual probe was replaced with a BBI probe
We generally use Dual to run 13C and BBI to run 2D. After changed the probe, the command "edhead" was used to set the probe. Put the sample tube, lock the solvent, and then type "atma" to tune the probe. We always do it like this, but now we can not tune the proton after installed the BBI probe (13C is OK). The dip can not be found by "atma", and "atmm" was also not work on forming a dip. What is the most possible reason for this error? How to solve it and avoid it in the future ? Thanks. (Instrument: Bruker 400 MHz,...
[Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum] same parameters but difference in phase why?
same parameters but difference in phase why?
hi, though this question seems to be easy for you but i am new for this software and to this field. Recently, i took silicon spectra in 500mhz(bruker) seems to be good (i.e.one silicon peak and one nmr tubes broad peak) but when i used same parameters for another sample where i got single peak as i expected but nmr tube peak is inverse this time. I just copied previous parameters only why i got such a inverse signal.If anybody know please help me.
thank you
Check if somebody has answered this question on NMRWiki QA forum
nmrlearner
News from other NMR forums
0
03-31-2011 09:21 PM
Comprehensive determination of 3JHNHα for unfolded proteins using 13C�-resolved spin-echo difference spectroscopy
Comprehensive determination of 3JHNHα for unfolded proteins using 13C�-resolved spin-echo difference spectroscopy
Abstract An experiment is presented to determine 3JHNHα coupling constants, with significant advantages for applications to unfolded proteins. The determination of coupling constants for the peptide chain using 1D 1H, or 2D and 3D 1H-15N correlation spectroscopy is often hampered by extensive resonance overlap when dealing with flexible, disordered proteins. In the experiment detailed here, the overlap problem is largely circumvented by recording 1H-13C� correlation...
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
01-09-2011 12:46 PM
[NMR paper] Probing specific lipid-protein interaction by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy.
Probing specific lipid-protein interaction by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy.
Related Articles Probing specific lipid-protein interaction by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy.
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Sep 28;127(38):13110-1
Authors: Soubias O, Gawrisch K
We studied the interaction of mono- and polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholines with rhodopsin by 1H NMR saturation transfer difference spectroscopy with magic angle spinning (STD-MAS NMR). The results indicate a strong preference for interaction of rhodopsin with the...
nmrlearner
Journal club
0
12-01-2010 06:56 PM
Difference between Bruker and Varian machine
Hello
I want to transplant some Varian pulse sequence to our Bruker machine. But I don't know exactly how to change the pulse phase. Some people told me I can keep all the pulse phase and just inverse the reciever phase. But I can't get the desired results by doing this. In some paper I just notice some more complicated changes to apply the same pulse sequence onto both machines.