Thread: Peak height versus peak volume
View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 02-25-2007, 12:54 PM
paul paul is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Points: 12, Level: 1
Points: 12, Level: 1 Points: 12, Level: 1 Points: 12, Level: 1
Level up: 23%, 38 Points needed
Level up: 23% Level up: 23% Level up: 23%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Peak height versus peak volume
Given a standard NOESY-based protein structure determination: Does anyone have any information on the benefits of measuring peak intensity by a volume integration method rather than simply measuring the peak height.

Obviously integration is theoretically more accurate, but does it make any difference to the quality of the structures produced? especially if peak lineshapes are comparable?

I was hoping to find some study comparing structures produced by both methods.....


I'm also curious about the benefits of distance-calbrating NOEs to a curve rather than simply putting restraints in a few different bins?
Reply With Quote

Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No